Monday, December 26, 2016

Debating Gravity and Falling Objects



The BBC video above is to prove heavy and light objects fall at the same time in a vacuum. This is a similar condition to outer space, except of course with gravity. We would have to believe BBC, and expect the footage to be original, and not some kind of doctored propaganda campaign. 

You may have noticed the height of the drop in the video above is not very high.

I did catch an anomaly in the footage. Watch closely at 3:24. You will see the frame freeze, and hitch, when the host is pointing at the computer screen. If they are watching objects free fall, and did not touch the footage, why would this happen? The best explanation would be a glitch in their own software while viewing for the BBC camera.


The video above proves beyond a shadow of a doubt larger objects fall at greater speeds here on earth. Notice that the height at which the objects were dropped is much higher than in the first video. This will be crucial to our understanding of the BBC footage, considering the information to follow.

Next we see video where objects may land at same time from short distances.


The guy above pushes the typical scientific idea that lighter and heavier objects fall at the same time.

This video also drops items from a low height, while saying they have the same acceleration.

Who brought us this principal? Galileo.

We find this principal reinforced in the article below, and also an explanation as to why heavier objects seem to fall faster.

https://van.physics.illinois.edu/qa/listing.php?id=164

"However, in the real world, we have things like air resistance, which is why sometimes heavy things do fall faster."

Eric Dubay holds fast to the idea the earth is flat and that there is no such force as gravity. He states buoyancy is the cause of  all objects falling and  rising. A denser object will fall faster, because it is heavier. Lighter objects fall slower, because they are lighter. Helium floats because it is lighter than air.

Funny enough, this is the exact explanation given by science.


levenement.ca

http://discoverykids.com/articles/why-do-helium-balloons-float/

A balloon will float to the surface of water, because it is lighter than water. Helium will float because it is lighter than air. - paraphrased information.

We see through common science, more often than not, that buoyancy is the answer.

Common to those who believe in gravity is that all objects have gravity. The truth from science is that all objects are not floating, they are falling through space. Orbital bodies are falling around each other. Our understanding of objects having mass means space itself is NOT, and never will be, zero gravity. According to science this gravity is caused by mass. Particles have mass. Space, not being a perfect vacuum, has particles.

This proves the BBC propaganda video to be a fraudulent hoax.

The man says "It's a miracle." Now I will prove why they are lying, and it is no miracle.

1) It's impossible to pump out all the air from their chamber.
2) They have not removed particle mass, which must exist in every particle in the chamber.
3) They only dropped the objects from a few meters, thus not being effective, and setting grounds for their bias.
4) We have proved that restrictions, such as air, particles, will slow falling objects.

Because of what we proved, we KNOW if they dropped the objects from a greater height, they would not have landed at the same time. It's impossible. These guys are liars.

I left this comment, which will likely disappear:

I'm not trying to disprove gravity, but shed light on lies, and false science. It's funny that what they're trying to prove, the conditions they're trying to invent to prove it, don't even exist. They don't even exist in outer space, where they are trying to prove it for! It's all ludicrous.

This isn't to say their science is, or isn't, off by miles. It does show that they are willing to lie, and lie blatantly. It also proves they are wrong, and theories they treat as Godly, such as Newtons laws, are mostly based on a modal that does not, and will not exist.

How wrong they are, we may never know.

For fun, lets explore some interesting words from Nichola Testla, which were publicized in a paper.

http://teslacollection.com/tesla_articles/1930///bonus_volume_new_york_sun_tesla_clipping_file_1930_1945

He found time while surveying his own past to express his sharp disagreement with the theories of Prof. Albert Einstein. He announced that the theory of relativity is "a mass of error and deceptive ideas and opposed to common sense," and that "not a single one of the relativity propositions has been proved."

No comments:

Post a Comment